The ban on social networks for employees: the pros and cons for the manager
Social networks are becoming a real problem for employers, because employees can give them too much work time. And not all managers are willing to put up with this situation, and even more, to pay for the time spent by such employee on the Internet. However, social networking in the workplace do not always have only negative sides.
Pros of banning social networks
Not every employee can organize his activities in order not to be distracted by trivia. And if he has a great temptation in the form of social networks, it can really forget about work and responsibilities, conducting chats and themes for most of my working day. This is especially true for those companies that do not monitor their employees, do not block entertainment sites and not very strictly ask employees about the results of their work. Discipline in such institutions suffer as well as performance, so it is necessary to establish at all levels, starting with head and ending with the subordinates.
In addition to reducing efficiency and concentration, social networks take a very long time. So, they ban allows the employee to devote these hours of work. Along with this immediately solves a lot of problems with timely submission of reports and plans, lack of overtime and rush jobs. The employees themselves are grateful for the removal of social networks and the ability to work quietly, without having to every minute to check for new messages and try to focus.
The ban on social networks
However, not all is so rosy after such restrictions. Staff bad attitude to the attempts of the authorities to restrict their freedom and loading tasks every minute of the work schedule. And, therefore, reduces the motivation of the people, their loyalty and desire to devote his efforts to work for the company. In addition, many foreign researchers believe that some time spent in communicating with friends on social network is perfectly capable to distract the staff, to give the brain the necessary rest and recharge, and therefore, as a result, to improve performance and prevent peruutusehdot person. Workers who enjoy short breaks during the day, able to work actively and fruitfully.
Besides, when the work is aimed at a specific goal, not matter how much time a person spends on the Internet, if with his work he manages. It is noticed that those who actively use social networks, are able to spend less time at work and time to make it on time for a short period of time. Such people are irreplaceable during rush, when we need to concentrate and need to do the job in minimal time. Forbidding employees to use social networks, and therefore, learn such useful skills, the head deprives them and the company many advantages.
Moreover, blocking websites will not help your head completely to deprive workers of their entertainment: to log into the social network through proxy servers. And even when the company constantly figure new ways to circumvent the ban, fined workers for the time spent on the Internet, people will find a way not to do work when they do not want to. After all this time, you can talk to colleagues, drink tea, surf the Internet with your phone or read a book. Wise leaders in this case do not prohibit the use of social networks, but just ask the staff on the results of their work. And when the work is done, and the Internet to communicate.